Song title 277 - All For Love |
|
This page lists the chart runs for songs called "All For Love" in order of success.
This list combines cover versions and distinct songs that happen to share the same title.
# |
Artist |
Song Title |
Year |
Chart Entries |
1 |
Bryan Adams, Rod Stewart & Sting |
All For Love |
1994 |
US Billboard 1 - Nov 1993 (22 weeks), Sweden 1 - Dec 1993 (11 weeks), Finland 1 for 3 weeks - Jan 1994, Austria 1 - Feb 1994 (4 months), Switzerland 1 - Jan 1994 (24 weeks), Norway 1 - Jan 1994 (17 weeks), Poland 1 - Dec 1993 (18 weeks), Italy 1 for 1 week - Jan 1994, Germany 1 - Jan 1994 (4 months), ODK Germany 1 - Jan 1994 (25 weeks) (4 weeks at number 1) (13 weeks in top 10), Eire 1 for 3 weeks - Jan 1994, Canada RPM 1 for 5 weeks - Dec 1993, Canada 1 of 1994, Australia 1 for 2 weeks - Jan 1994, Europe 1 for 9 weeks - Jan 1994, Germany 1 for 4 weeks - Feb 1994, UK 2 - Jan 1994 (13 weeks), Belgium 2 - Jan 1994 (13 weeks), US Platinum (certified by RIAA in Feb 1994), Holland 3 - Jan 1994 (13 weeks), Germany Gold (certified by BMieV in 1994), Switzerland 7 of 1994, US BB 8 of 1994, Japan (Tokyo) 9 - Dec 1993 (17 weeks), Italy 9 of 1994, Australia 10 of 1994, Japan (Osaku) 12 of 1994 (peak 3 26 weeks), ARC 15 of 1994 (peak 1 18 weeks), Brazil 16 of 1994, US CashBox 22 of 1994, POP 25 of 1994, US Radio 27 of 1994 (peak 1 11 weeks), Germany 87 of the 1990s (peak 1 14 weeks), Holland free40 94 of 1994, UK Silver (certified by BPI in Feb 1994) |
2 |
E.M.D. |
All For Love |
2007 |
Sweden 1 - Dec 2007 (12 weeks) |
3 |
Adriana Evans |
All For Love |
2007 |
Japan (Tokyo) 32 - Mar 2007 (5 weeks) |
4 |
Marc Et Claude |
All For Love |
2003 |
France 6 - Jun 2003 (1 week) |
5 |
Wohlfahrt, Wurst, Kesici & Die Berliner Symphoniker |
All For Love |
2003 |
ODK Germany 25 - Nov 2003 (9 weeks) |
|
Previous Comments (newest first)
1 May 2018
Double Listing - Bryan Adams, Rod Stewart & Sting
#1 & #6 are the same. Per 'Hollandfree40' website Artist name reads 'Adams, Stewart & Sting' (not Andy Stewart Sings).
You are right, that was a bad auto-correction that was not spotted. Thanks